Does fl studio for mac use windows applications? software#

any software that uses X11? OSX now has X11 support.

So you're back to square one - OSX is a niche system, and it makes your life as developer harder, while mainstream systems, like Linux, make it easier. But on OSX, unlike on Linux, you cannot expect Apple to actually backport the fix and release it in software update. but wait, why doesn't it understand GCC 4.2 x86_64 flags like -march=native? As pointed by Jano, it's a bug.

Does fl studio for mac use windows applications? full#

None of them has full feature set (comparing to default consoles in Linux), each of them has at least one of the problems (like messed up line wrapping, no tab support or problems with UTF-8).

decent terminal: you have few choices, the default Terminal.app, the iTerm and dozen others.

( Update: this seems to be finally fixed in Mavericks, even though last 2 years I've been told numerous times that it would contradict 'the Mac way'). I mean, if you'd like interface designed about ppl who care about HCI, you'd choose Linux or Win7 anyway. But it's OSX so who'd care about ergonomy when you can have eyecandy. It will be ugly, unresponsive and at times will display bunch of 'N/A' instead of menu. You can get lame 'solution' for that, called SecondBar. multi-screen support: hey, looking for your IDE's menu? it's on main screen, not the one you're working on.

They are not compatible at all with each other, and using more than one of them at time guarantees total chaos and rendering your OSS unusable.

to make things more interesting, there are other alternatives to MacPorts, like Homebrew and previously Fink.

Sometimes compilation instructions for OSX 10.5 will work on 10.6, sometimes they won't. Then you have to download source and compile it (welcome to 1980's). If you're not lucky, there is no MacPort for software you're looking for. Want Qt? Reserve 5 hours for compilation. It downloads the package and compiles it. Installing MacPorts feels like Linux 15 years ago.

installing open source software: if you're lucky there's MacPort for it.

Apparently I'm not the only one switching from OSX back to Linux.ДЄll the tools you take for granted in Linux are either non-existent or painful to get to work on OSX:

I've been using MacOS X for about half a year on my dev machine and I definitely wound not recommend it to developer, other than iPhone/OSX developers (they don't have a choice, do they?). I tried to find things that can be done on Mac but not on Windows with the same level of ease, but I couldn't. If you develop daily on Mac and prefer Mac over anything else, can you give me a merit that Mac has over Windows/Linux? Maybe something you can do on Mac that cannot be done in Windows/Linux with the same level of ease?

Does fl studio for mac use windows applications? mac os x#

However, I don't see what strong merits Mac OS X has over Windows. I understand why people, who are working in multimedia/entertainment industry, would use Mac OS X.

Does fl studio for mac use windows applications? upgrade#

Is it because you need to upgrade Windows every 2 years (less backwards compatible)? Is it the applications that are only available on Mac OS X? Does that really make it worth it? Although Windows is not nix based, you can pretty much develop on any platform or language, except Cocoa/Objective-C. Some might argue that Mac OS X got the beautiful UI and is nix based, but Linux can do that. I know that there are programmers who prefer Windows and Linux, but I'm asking the programmers who would just use Mac OS X and nothing else, because they think Mac OS X is the greatest fit for programmers. However, I'm still having a hard time understanding why programmers enthusiastically choose Mac OS X over Windows and Linux? I've worked on both Mac and Windows for awhile. It is not currently accepting new answers or interactions. This question and its answers are locked because the question is off-topic but has historical significance.